EnigmA Amiga Run 1997 July/EnigmA AMIGA RUN 20 (1997)(G.R. Edizioni)(IT)[!][issue 1997-07 & 08][EAR-CD IV].iso/lightwave/lwmlist/95.lightwave-10/001541_owner-lightwav…mail.webcom.com_Fri Oct 27 23:48:03 1995.msg

Internet Message Format | 1995-11-07 | 2KB

Received: by mail.webcom.com
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA061352883; Fri, 27 Oct 1995 23:48:03 -0700
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from netcom17.netcom.com by mail.webcom.com with ESMTP
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA061292878; Fri, 27 Oct 1995 23:47:58 -0700
Received: by netcom17.netcom.com (8.6.12/Netcom)
    id XAA05104; Fri, 27 Oct 1995 23:39:41 -0700
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 1995 23:39:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: John Gross <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: GLOW and FIELD RENDERING QUESTION
Cc: [e-mail]
In-Reply-To: <[e-mail]>
Message-Id: <Pine.3.89.9510272335.A3252-0100000@netcom17>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk


> I believe that it is you who are wrong. The reason you 'notice' flash
> frames is because they have nothing to do with the previous image so they
> become much more noticeable. Persistence of vision does not imply that
> you won't notice a very different frame at 30 frames per second. Film is
> only 24 frames per second at it works as well.

I can usually spot a missing frame from a series of like frames. Perhaps
it's a "trained" eye...

JG
--
John Gross <[e-mail]> sent this message.
To Post a Message           : [e-mail]
Un/Subscription Requests To : [e-mail]
(DIGEST)                 or : [e-mail]
Administrative Items To     : [e-mail]